Ahh, jumped the gun a bit too quickly on that one - the grammar threw me off a bit. To not overwrite a /tmp that already exists seems very reasonable to me.
cheers, -Matt > Matthew Smith wrote: > > I assume you mean as a link to a windows temp directory somewhere. However, > > what if that gets changed by someone? Suddenly a lot of stuff starts > > breaking, and people start posting here asking why application foo isn't > > working. The majority of the people are fine with a hardwired /tmp > > directory. If you're not, make the symlink yourself. > > > > His request was to _not_delete_a_symlink_he_made_himself and replace it > with a directory named /tmp. > > Earnie. > >
