----- Original Message ----- From: Joshua Daniel Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2002 11:02:09 -0800 (PST) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [nasm packaging review] was Re: Pending packages status
> ... > An alternative would be to have a separate nasm-doc package with all the > documentation, which would keep the smaller binary download for people that > do not need the docs. > I agree that both the man and info docs should be available in the binary distribution. As for the additional (pdf, ps, html) documentation, I'm open to suggestion. The extra docs are certainly very comprehensive, although I don't often consult them. I also notice that the nasm project provides a separate nasm-0.98.35-xdoc package. In any case, I'll repackage the existing package to make everything and make install_everything, I'll post an update soon. Cheers, Dean Scarff -- _______________________________________________ Get your free email from http://mymail.operamail.com Powered by Outblaze
