David Starks-Browning wrote: > On Wednesday 22 Jan 03, Igor Pechtchanski writes: >>> IMO, the best solution would be adding a "sort by best bandwidth" >>> button or something similar to the mirror display. Then, setup can >>> query all of the mirrors and put the "closest" one at top. It >>> could save that order in some file locally, too. >>> >>> cgf >> >> Yep, and have a "Re-ping" button that the user could press to >> re-evaluate the bandwidth. This way, the only time it happens >> automatically is the first time setup is run, and after that it's >> under user control. > > If I may interject, I hope setup never does this automatically, not > even the first time it runs. Can an arbitrary sort order be > acceptable by default, unless the user wants to sort by ping > performance?
I agree. Max.
