[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As do I!!! [After all I was the one who stirred up the fuss in the firstplace ;-)]On Sat, 2003-01-25 at 22:56, Max Bowsher wrote:I hope that using the term "non-persistent" does not delay the voting process...Definitely not. I vote "pro" regardless of what name we choose.I second this. In fact, IMO this vote should really be a formality - this is core infrastructure after all. Rob
Pierre, can you test this on your winme box and see if it will allow you to run apache? I've got too many "orphaned" dlls lurking about to be a reliable candidate for testing (no, apache still won't run here).
Cheers,
Nicholas
