Compiling from a branch? How did I manage that? I just have 'gcc' downloaded -- If I install the gcc2 package will the ./configure script just 'do the right thing' and select the compiler it works with or will it just use 'gcc' and end up using the current gcc?
Did I some how manage to download mismatched headers for the compiler or something? -l > -----Original Message----- > From: Pavel Tsekov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sat, Mar 08, 2003 1:48p > To: linda w (cyg) > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: when is next release of setup.exe > > > You've obviously compiling from a branch. Branched setup is not > gcc3 ready. Install gcc-2 package and use gcc-2 + g++-2 to compile > setup.exe. > > On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, linda w (cyg) wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Igor Pechtchanski > > > > > Cygwin setup compiles fine with Cygwin gcc. > > --- > > Pardon me, kind sir, but I have a "itty bitty teensie weensie" > > problem with this: > > > > make all-recursive > > make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/setup-0' > > Making all in bz2lib > > make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/setup-0/bz2lib' > > make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'. > > make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/setup-0/bz2lib' > > Making all in zlib > > make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/setup-0/zlib' > > make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'. > > make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/setup-0/zlib' > > Making all in libgetopt++ > > make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/setup-0/libgetopt++' > > source='src/GetOption.cc' object='src/GetOption.lo' libtool=yes \ > > depfile='src/.deps/GetOption.Plo' > tmpdepfile='src/.deps/GetOption.TPlo' \ > > depmode=gcc3 /bin/bash ./cfgaux/depcomp \ > > /bin/bash ./libtool --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. > -I. -I./include -I./i > > nclude -g -O2 -c -o src/GetOption.lo `test -f > 'src/GetOption.cc' || echo './' > > `src/GetOption.cc > > g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I./include -I./include -g -O2 > -c src/GetOption.cc > > -MT src/GetOption.lo -MD -MP -MF src/.deps/GetOption.TPlo > -DPIC -o src/.libs/Ge > > tOption.o > > In file included from include/getopt++/GetOption.h:19, > > from src/GetOption.cc:19: > > include/getopt++/OptionSet.h:31: `ostream' was not declared > in this scope > > include/getopt++/OptionSet.h:31: parse error before `)' token > > In file included from src/GetOption.cc:20: > > include/getopt++/Option.h:33: ISO C++ forbids declaration > of `string' with no > > type > > include/getopt++/Option.h:33: `string' declared as a `virtual' field > > include/getopt++/Option.h:33: parse error before `const' > > include/getopt++/Option.h:35: ISO C++ forbids declaration > of `string' with no > > type > > include/getopt++/Option.h:35: `string' declared as a `virtual' field > > include/getopt++/Option.h:35: declaration of `int Option::string' > > include/getopt++/Option.h:33: conflicts with previous > declaration `int > > Option::string' > > include/getopt++/Option.h:35: parse error before `const' > > include/getopt++/Option.h:35: duplicate member `Option::string' > > make[2]: *** [src/GetOption.lo] Error 1 > > make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/setup-0/libgetopt++' > > make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/setup-0' > > make: *** [all] Error 2 > > > ============================================================== > ============ > > Twas all so minorly amused by this discussion as I was > just about to > > ask if setup was supposed to be able to be compiled under cygwin. > > I'm using "setup-2.249.2.5.tar.bz2".... > > > > Not that I'm demanding anything, or anything, and not to be > disagreeable > > (though I'm often seen that way)...but could you give me any hints > > as to why I'm unable to compile -- other than "well, you idjiot > > (inflected form of idiot), it's obvious that you didn't > declare ostream > > in the proper scope!"...:-(. Very sad. > > > > (*wry smile*) > > -linda > > > > > > > > > >
