> On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 07:58, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 07:49:27AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > > >Also, I'd prefer /etc/setup.rc rather that /etc/setup/setup.cfg. > > > > Wouldn't /etc/setuprc be somewhat more consistent with existing unix > > practices? > > Sure. I'm happy with that too. Mind you, having an extension allows > association of a handler in the windows GUI. >
*.rc is a Windows resource file though. -- Gary R. Van Sickle Brewer. Patriot.
