On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 10:49, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > I tend to agree with Max here (even though I have a broadband connection). > I'm *really* wary of touching remote repositories. And we could use > mailing list archives for patch history. ;-)
mailing list archives are nowhere near as easy for me to perform partch
archaeology on.
> Also, I'd rather be aware of
> the conflicts between patches as I'm developing them, rather than when the
> time comes to apply them to HEAD...
Sure. And you could do that via a branch that was up to date with both
patch branches.
HEAD
/ \
p1 p2
\ /
p3
where p3 shows the merged patch, and p1 and p2 are the isolated
changesets.
> So thanks for the offer, Rob, but I
> don't think I'll be using it anytime soon...
> Igor
Thats fine. I'm happy as long as I get single-change patches.
Rob
--
GPG key available at: <http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
