Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: > >> Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >>> On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: >>> >>>> OK to add the correct double-space between NAME and <EMAIL> in the >>>> ChangeLog lines "DATE NAME <EMAIL>"? >>>> >>>> There are 24 single-spaced lines compared with 283 double-spaced lines. >>>> Max. >>> >>> FWIW, I count 125 single-spaced lines vs. 294 double-spaced lines... I >>> used the following patterns in vim: >>> >>> /^[^ \t].*[^ ] </ for single-spaced, and >>> /^[^ \t].*[^ ] </ for double-spaced. >>> >>> This also brings up an interesting question of what the proper date >>> format is. Most (320) dates are in the YYYY-MM-DD format, but some >>> (99) are in the "Dow Mon DD HH:MM:SS YYYY" format, and some of those >>> have 2 spaces before YYYY. Weird. >> >> Hmm. I hadn't noticed the old date format, so my regexps didn't match >> any of those lines. >> However, your regexps match some lines incorrectly - for example: >> * archive_tar_file.cc: Include <algorithm>. >> * inilex.l: Recognise Build-Depends-Indep, [,], >, < and remove >> (filedef): Create == and < operators for STL use. >> Max. > > They don't for me, but this could be because I have vim set to > 'nocompatible' or something. The "\t" matches a Tab. If you substitute > that by a literal Tab character, these should work even in 'compatible' > mode.
I was using egrep. Max.
