Charles Wilson wrote: > No really, this IS on topic. > > Many moons ago, I grew so frustrated with the official cvs maintainers > at cvshome.com -- no updates in forever, disdainful of outside > contributions etc -- that I decided that the next release of cvs that I > made would come from the cvsnt codebase, since that was seeing active > development. > > Plus, it had support for many server protocols, and getting cvshome's > cvs to act as a server on cygwin had limited success. Granted, cvshome > is now seeing (some) activity (2 patch releases in eight months! Woo > hoo!) but that doesn't change the problem with the servers; cvsnt is > already designed for service on windows...even tho it ALSO compiles on > unix. So, I'm looking at cvsnt, and...
Chuck, are you sure this is a good idea? cvsnt has recently dropped any pretence of mainining syncronization with cvshome. Or, even, is there any reason not to have *both* cvs and cvsnt in the Cygwin distribution? I've been playing with cvs-1.11.5 and sanity.sh. There are no regressions when run with ntsec on. Do you have any intention to release a cvs-1.11.5 package? If not, would you prefer I made one and offered it to you for review, or that I ITP'ed it on my own? Max.
