Pierre A. Humblet wrote: > At 11:53 PM 4/5/2003 +0100, Max Bowsher wrote: >> >> Sounds reasonable. But discussion seems to have fizzled regarding >> Pierre's patch, so we must be careful it isn't forgotten. > > I go by what Rob wrote earlier >>> I've fixed the bug in both HEAD and the release branch. We'll save your >>> second patch for the next release. > My second patch needed to be regenerated against the current CVS, due > to Rob's intervening changes in the ntsec routine. > It's ready. Do you want it now or after the coming release? > > Pierre > > P.S.: After the renumbering stuff, can I still simply run "cvs update" > to get the latest version?
Yes. Max.
