Robert Collins wrote: > On Sun, 2003-04-06 at 20:15, Max Bowsher wrote: >> Robert Collins wrote: >>> On Sun, 2003-04-06 at 19:40, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: >>> >>> >>>> The question is not what I'd like, but what you won't. If RECTWrapper >>>> is still acceptable, that's what it'll be. >>> >>> RECTWrapper is still acceptable. >> >> Can we go with RECTAdapter? It doesn't wrap, and since Robert said >> RECTAdapter was also OK, we might as well use that. > > Sure. RECTAdapter is also OK. I don't care which. > > As a data point: it does wrap though - as it inherits from RECT.
Must... not... start... discussion... of... semantics... of... the... word... "wrap"! :-) >> For the record, Robert, I still think RECTPP is the best name. > > I understand that, but disagree. I thought it was pretty clear in my > first review email! Crystal clear. But I've only just given up trying to persuade you otherwise! Max.
