On Sun, 27 Jul 2003, Daniel B��wetter wrote: > Hi Volker, > > Volker Quetschke wrote: > > > [...] > > Well, beside the fact that you don't provide a patch to restore the > > original source archive. This is the main (?) reason to provide the > > patch, it is there to get back the official sources. > > > Grr @!%$, forgot to put it into the source archive again :) Fixed. > > > > > The original source archive contains a Makefile, which you removed. > > > No, mine doesn't. The original download site for psutils seems to be > down for the past few days, so I got the source from a mirror. It did > not contain a file named Makefile. Does your's? > > BTW, My first release of the source package contained a Makefile which I > removed, because *you* (spotlight on :-) said it was *not* in the > original source. > > > > > You also added the CYGWIN-PATCHES dir (This is good, but it's not > > in the original sources. > > > http://cygwin.com/setup.html told me to. Isn't this the usual way to > include Cygwin-specific stuff?
Yes it is. What I think Volker is saying is that the 'CYGWIN-PATCHES' directory wouldn't be removed (or added) by the patch you provided. > > > > I attached a patch that IMHO does it right. I also "modified" the > > already present $(prefix) variable that you now can do: > > > Looks good. I modified the Makefile.unix and README accordingly. I'm sorry I haven't updated the list regarding your package proposal, I will try and have an updated list out in a few hours (max) :-) Are the URL's the same (for your above modifications)? Elfyn -- Elfyn McBratney, EMCB | http://www.nongnu.org/wwwauth/ http://www.emcb.co.uk | http://www.emcb.co.uk/webauth/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | wwwauth-users AT nongnu DOT org
