Andrew M. Inggs wrote: > Max Bowsher wrote: >> Andrew M. Inggs wrote: >> >>> Could you include the ChangeLog on its own rather than using a >>> diff-generated version? >> >> Why? The issue below? That's independent.
> It would make it easier to read, in my opinion. I do strip off the diff surroundings, leaving only the + prefixed on each line. > It's also pretty standard policy to make it easier for the person > applying the patch. I guess it's not relevant here since you apply your own. Right. And if I were making patches for someone else to apply, I would include the ChangeLog as a zero-context unidiff (-U0), which would add to the top of ChangeLog regardless of it's contents. Max.
