On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 03:47:05PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 06:36:20PM +0200, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote: > > I don't know whether RFU is a known acronym.. anyways: > > > > Ready for upload: pcre packages conformant to FHS (AFAICT) > > The only one that actually changes is the -doc, but hey.. > > Built against 1.5.2, of course. > > > > No other changes > > > > Available here: > > 700204763641f9a8d90d822353329874 *libpcre0-4.3-4.tar.bz2 > > b149e3c9d04f8f61568259d8a63777c0 *pcre-4.3-4-src.tar.bz2 > > c607a93de2ffff3742997eb4c93af7fa *pcre-4.3-4.tar.bz2 > > 2023538c75c9db46c7536b0db01d2cc8 *pcre-devel-4.3-4.tar.bz2 > > 5c3e6189710c255e75739f8e8b1a4731 *pcre-doc-4.3-4.tar.bz2 > > http://blytkerchan.chez.tiscali.fr/libpcre0-4.3-4.tar.bz2 > > http://blytkerchan.chez.tiscali.fr/pcre-4.3-4-src.tar.bz2 > > http://blytkerchan.chez.tiscali.fr/pcre-4.3-4.tar.bz2 > > http://blytkerchan.chez.tiscali.fr/pcre-devel-4.3-4.tar.bz2 > > http://blytkerchan.chez.tiscali.fr/pcre-doc-4.3-4.tar.bz2 > > I've removed release 4.2-2. Is there any reason to keep 4.3-1 and > 4.3-3? OK. I don't see any reason to keep them around: 4.3-1 is missing a file, 4.3-3 just has a non-FHS-compliant directory structure, but neither is otherwise different from their successor.
rlc NB: won't be announcing as this is a test version.. -- "The move was on to 'Free the Lizard'" -- Jim Hamerly and Tom Paquin (Open Sources, 1999 O'Reilly and Associates)
