On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 10:33:19PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: > >>On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 10:57:06PM +0200, Lapo Luchini wrote: >> >>>Packaging gmp lead me to think this: can a processor a little better >>>than "386" be assumed on Cygwin users? >>>(i.e. used to build a package?) >> >>I think that these days we require at least a 486, yes. > >In 2000, DJ wrote: "Please do not break older systems." > >http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2000-07/msg00037.html (contains a >reply to DJ; DJ's original message is not in the archives). > >Just a data point -- that WAS three years ago, after all.
I've already done that with the "new" Interlocked* functions which, I believe, don't work on i386. Those were turned on by default on 2002-12-14. cgf
