On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 02:31:34PM -0400, Daniel Reed wrote: > On 2003-10-17T19:34+0200, Daniel Boesswetter wrote: > ) >Package: tcm 2.20-1 > ) >Description: Toolkit for Conceptual Modeling (TCM) > ) > Proposer: Daniel Boesswetter > ) > Proposal: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-01/msg00299.html > ) > http://home.in.tum.de/~boesswet/tcm-2.20-1.tar.bz2 > ) > http://home.in.tum.de/~boesswet/tcm-2.20-1-src.tar.bz2 > ) > http://home.in.tum.de/~boesswet/setup.hint > ) > Problems: If this does fall under cygwin-apps since it is not an "X package" > but a "package that requires X", should the package be recreated with prefix set to > /usr instead of /usr/X11R6? (cygwin-apps-get.11645) > ) > > ) _This_is_no_problem_. As we found out in > ) http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-10/msg00211.html, X-apps are > ) supposed to live under /usr/X11R6. I won't rebuild the package unless > ) something more serious is found. > > Binaries and libraries are under /usr/X11R6/, but it appears anything that > would be "shared" between potential X-only and non-X versions of the package > should be prefixed in /usr (i.e. man pages should be in /usr/share/man > instead of /usr/X11R6/man or /usr/X11R6/share/man).
I don't think so. The X11 packages are prefixed to /usr/X11 entirely. Ther's no need to move stuff from /usr/X11R6/share to /usr/share. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc.
