Christopher schrieb: > On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 01:13:28PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: >>Hallo, >> >>I would like to rename this package to mingw-gcc. Probably it would be >>no bad idea to introduce a new category 'MinGW' similar to the 'XFree' >>category for future additions. >> >>Any comments?
> It is not worth the aggravation. Just a thought. Wouldn't be too much work for me now as I'm nearly finished now I'm going to tar it up soon. > (and I haven't officially passed the gcc maintainership baton to you > yet) Oh. Anyway, I have another question about the mingw package. I think it is neccessary to include also the MinGW version of libgcj.a as it is done with libstdc++ to get gcj working with -mno-cygwin and similar with the ada_lib & ada_include directories. Since it would be a huge package this should also be splitted like I will do for cygwin-gcc, one package for each front end and one for the core (including the c front end). Then the package names would be gcc-g++-3.3.1-3.tar.bz2, ... and gcc-g++-mingw-3.3.1-3.tar.bz2, ... Would be easier for Joe User if the MinGW packages are easy to identify with the mingw prefix. Gerrit -- =^..^=
