On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 05:14:18PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: >Christopher schrieb: > >> On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 10:13:16AM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: >>>Ah, I think I have to put the gcc-core package in its own subdirectory >>>because the directory name is taken as the package name, right? > >> That's what I did yesterday to silence the warnings. > >Yep, I saw it, many thanks. Should I exchange the empty gzip tarball >with an empty bzip2 tarball (because there were already complaints about >the empty gz tarball with suffix bz2 not being a bzip2 but a gzip >tarball)?
I did that a few minutes ago but then decided to just remove the "binary" tar ball entirely since it isn't a requirement. Yesterday, I thought there had to be something there but I'd forgotten that the setup package just consists of a source tarball so a binary tar file obviously isn't required.
