On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 09:34:04AM -0000, Morrison, John wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >> Maintainers/Packages List, 2003-11-22) >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 11:17:51PM -0500, Daniel Reed wrote: >>> On 2003-11-24T11:01-0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> ) On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 10:55:40AM -0500, Daniel Reed wrote: >>> ) >For now it's just in my records. Even if it is made publicly >>> tunable, I ) >imagine it will be made outside of setup.hint (since >>> that is for setup's ) >benefit). ) We could decide on a comment >>> convention for setup.hint that could be ) used for some other tool >>> to process: ) >>> ) #!binary only >>> >>> That works, or maybe even #!binary-only and either let multiple >>> flags be on one line or allow flags to have arguments. >> >> Good point. >> >>> sdesc: "Frobdicates kernel sources" >>> category: Devel >>> requires: cygwin >>> #!maintainer "Daniel Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" >>> #!alert-maintainer >> >> I think I like this one more since it is closer to the way setup.hint >> already operates. >> > >Is it a good idea to have the maintainers email address in there?
No, you're right. It isn't. Or at least it would be a good idea except for the obvious drawback of having this file trolled by spammers. cgf