On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 03:10:51AM +0000, David F wrote: >>) We could decide on a comment convention for setup.hint that could be >>) used for some other tool to process: >>) >>) #!binary only >> >>That works, or maybe even #!binary-only and either let multiple flags be on >>one line or allow flags to have arguments. > >It's a bit contrived, but...
A *bit* contrived? >~$ ./setup.hint >bash: ./setup.hint: binary-only: bad interpreter: No such file or directory > >Perhaps the special comment should be something other than the shebang? >Just a thought. I pledge to never try to execute setup.hints and be confused by the output if I see the above. I certainly hope that the rest of the cygwin maintainers take that pledge as well. cgf
