On 2003-12-02T00:00-0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote: ) Let's see, Igor voted pro, I obviously vote pro... now we need one more ) vote to upload.
I don't normally list reviewers as voting "pro" automatically. I think it might be important that people can feel free to review package proposals without giving the impression they approve of the software contained in the package. That is, I might review a package I have no familiarity with in order to ensure its packaging complies with conventions, its setup.hint lists correct dependencies, that running the .exe does not cause obviously incorrect behavior, etc. I probably would not provide a "good to go" unless I was familiar with the program, but I could conceivably provide one even if I did not have an opinion on whether it should be included or not, just for the sake of speeding things along. That being said, I will list you as voting pro for suite3270. The suite3270 proposal is now only one vote away, as you stated. -- Daniel Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://naim-users.org/nmlorg/ http://naim.n.ml.org/ "A professor is one who talks in someone else's sleep."
