On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 03:07:56PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >On Tue, 3 Feb 2004, Andreas Seidl wrote: > >> [snip] >> Interestingly, gcc-3.2 has a hit, but *not* gcc-3.3: >> >> usr/include/gnu/gcj/convert/Input_iconv.h >> usr/include/gnu/gcj/convert/Output_iconv.h >> >> And gcc-3.2-3.tar.bz2 is four times as big as gcc-3.3.1-3.tar.bz2. > >Starting with gcc-3.3.1, the monolithic 'gcc' package got split into >'gcc', 'gcc-g++', 'gcc-gcj', 'gcc-ada', etc, with the source in >'gcc-core'. The above two files will probably have moved to 'gcc-gcj'.
I haven't been paying close attention but perhaps this discussion should be moved to the cygwin mailing list. This topic has been rehashed many times there. If we haven't reached the point where we can actually *build* the package then it clearly shouldn't even be a candidate for an ITP. cgf
