On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 04:27:06PM -0500, Nicholas Wourms wrote: >cgf wrote: >>On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 07:39:49PM +0100, Andreas Seidl wrote: >>>However, a new problem might have popped up. Reading this thread >>>http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-02/msg01103.html >>> >>>I wonder if there are legal problems for RedHat to distribute the ccrypt >>>package? > >Next time, please keep it to yourself.
I'm sure you wouldn't enjoy it if Red Hat was taken to task for something that could have been caught early, decided that cygwin wasn't worth the hassle, and pulled it from sources.redhat.com. But, hey, thanks for clarifying just whom I can trust to be watching out for the project's interests.
