On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 02:02:10PM +0200, Bertalan Fodor wrote: >> Because of an oversight of our Cygwin maintainer, there actually were >> no image links included in lilypond-doc-2.2.0-1, and that's probably >> why Chris demanded these files to be moved again. >Well, that's true. I was very afraid of this new feature, and was sure it >will cause problems. But it was more important to have the new version built >than to have this feature. > >And there is an other problem: cygwin still has only texinfo 4.2, while 4.7 >is available. I used 4.6 to build the package, but its texi2dvi script is >broken (so I used 4.2 texi2dvi). What version of texinfo is needed to build >correctly? > >Anyway, why is it so important to not have a lilypond directory in >/usr/share/info if it works?
Because lilypond doesn't get to set precedent for cygwin. cgf
