> Harold L Hunt II wrote: > > > Okay, it is fixed now. There is a 6.0.4 version that is > posted. The > > release notes explain the source of the problem (read: me). > > > > In addition, I installed jasper, lcms, and libfpx so > support for these > > was compiled in. ImageMagick doesn't seem to do anything > with libwmf... > > is that correct? > > Hmm... oh, I see: libwmf support is not built in unless > --with-modules=yes is used. We have not been enabling module > support in > the past and I didn't enable it in this release so libwmf was > ignored. > Comments on whether we should be enabling modules?
Would it break anything? If not then I'd say go for it. Chris
