On Aug 19 23:00, Robert Collins wrote: > I'm also not keen on this for several reasons: > * subversion doesn't address the issues with merging & distribution that > made it difficult for folk with long-running patches to stay in sync > * subversion appears to be a very fragile system (I'm working with quite > a few projects that involve subversion, and breakage is common). > * plus of course, that the rest of the project has shown no interest (at > this point) in moving.
That's a fairly good summary. I also don't see a reason to move to another sccs for this project. Also keep in mind that you're adding another burden to the overseers folks. That's not worth it. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc.