Robert Collins wrote:
On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 23:42 +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
Unless we add explicit copy-constructors to every single class, I'd
rather
just leave it out and let the compiler handle things implicitly? It seems
cleaner to me.
I think you'll find every class that has a destructor also has an
explicit copy constructor & assignment operator. That class certainly
has an explicit assignment operator... being explicit on the copy
constructor is consistent.
Have you heard of the 'rule of 3' ?
No. Apparently I need to do some reading.
Max.
