On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 01:29:47PM -0500, Brian Ford wrote: >On Sun, 10 Oct 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>Funny, but I thought that we'd discussed this a while ago for use with >>cygcheck but now I can't see why cygcheck would need it. > >http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-09/msg00381.html ?
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-09/msg00455.html cgf
