Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Yes, cool. Now I think I can distinguish between 'wrong' and valid const struct definitions. May I consider using 'const' for structs which are not really constant (i.e. containig a variable) as harmful?
Yes. But also, structs which contain the (usually constant on all but braindead platforms, like Winblows) ADDRESS of a variable which is imported from a shared lib (DLL), are also not allowed to be const.
-- Chuck
