On Jan 29 11:05, Eric Blake wrote: > I think I finally have something ready for submission on the coreutils > front. Do I get the couple of gold stars promised in > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2005-01/msg00727.html?
Absolutely. Igor, do you have a couple of them handy? > This release is marked as test for several reasons: > [...] > - pathchk regressed in behavior. In 5.2.1, `pathchk file/x' failed with a > message that file is not a directory, but in 5.3.0 it silently succeeds. I > don't know if this is worth patching locally or waiting for cygwin 1.5.13. That's a Cygwin problem and will be fixed in 1.5.13, thanks to Pierre. > - New cygwin-local patch to df attempts to display more information about > disk mounts. In particular, `df --local' and `df -T' are now more > informative. Cool. > - I bundled coreutils kill as gkill, rather than omitting it altogether Oh boy. Now we have *three* kills, kill from the Cygwin package, prockill from the procps package and gkill from the coreutils package. Isn't that overkill? > file size md5sum > http://home.comcast.net/~ericblake/coreutils-5.3.0-1.tar.bz2 > 1960871 11201aa0da4392b470495a0a34a14362 > http://home.comcast.net/~ericblake/coreutils-5.3.0-1-src.tar.bz2 > 4540274 9dbda9a656afe9ff49ad63df6f92558e > http://home.comcast.net/~ericblake/coreutils.setup.hint > (prev: 5.2.1-4, curr: 5.2.1-5, test: 5.3.0-1) > 715 035dbed37f61544f14194a145bf056b5 Packaging looks good. I've uploaded the package. Please send an announce posting to cygwin-announce. Don't forget to include the unsubscribe instructions in your announcement. Please consider to put this package out of "test" in a couple of days. Thanks again for taking overe maintainership. That's worth every gold star :-) Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:[email protected] Red Hat, Inc.
