--- "Gerrit P. Haase" wrote:
> James R. Phillips wrote: > > > I will admit that I haven't compiled a working octave package with cygwin > gcc > > 3.4.4-1. I think there may be a bag of issues there as well. I reverted > back > > to gcc 3.3.3 to compile octave 2.1.71. > > Please send your observations about problems with (Cygwin) gcc-3.4.4. > > Will do so, when I am satisfied the build process is correct under gcc 3.3.3. I want to get a correctly working package, and then switch compilers, and find out what breaks. Jim Phillips
