I've updated bash_completion last week, but did not do so with the debugger, because I wanted to wait until your bash-3.0 will stabilize. It's just at my private setup site, since it's no official package. http://tu.xarch.at/publ/cygwin
Unfortunately my site died yesterday due to a hacker who turned off httpd, so it will need some days to turn it on again. Finally I have to bite the bullet and clean init. If you want to please take it over, eric. If it's urgent I'll sent you the patches and .sh per email. > A long time ago, Reini proposed an ITP for bashdb and bash_completion: > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2004-10/msg00423.html. Following > through that thread, the biggest controversy was bashdb, since it didn't > play well with bash-2.05b, and Reini didn't want to package > bash_completion without bashdb. The thread seemed to die here, with > nothing added to the > distribution: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2004-10/msg00579.html > > Anyways, now that bash has a new maintainer, and has been bumped to 3.0, > does that ease the interaction of packaging a shell-script debugger? sure, still some patches to apply but easier than with 2.05b > Also, I would like to see bash_completion added to the distribution. that's very easy, but this should be a seperate package. > Are you still interested in providing these packages, Reini? not really. -- Reini Urban http://phpwiki.org/ http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/
