-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 According to Jari Aalto on 9/8/2005 2:26 PM: > | > http://cygwin.cante.net/bzr/setup.hint \
Minor nit - typo (s/inplemented/implemented/) > | > http://cygwin.cante.net/bzr/bzr-0.0.7-1.tar.bz2.sig \ > | > http://cygwin.cante.net/bzr/bzr-0.0.7-1.tar.bz2 \ Looks okay on inspection. As for actually using the package, I've never tried arch or bzr, so I am just trusting that the binaries do what they were intended to do - that is not a showstopper, since the package is already in the debian testing distro. > | > http://cygwin.cante.net/bzr/bzr-0.0.7-1-src.tar.bz2.sig \ > | > http://cygwin.cante.net/bzr/bzr-0.0.7-1-src.tar.bz2 Doesn't use g-b-s, but that should not be problematic. My problem is that it depends on cygbuild: [...] ./bzr-0.0.7-1.sh: line 1143: type: cygbuild.pl: not found [NOTE] To build a source package you may need to install http://cygbuild.sourceforge.net/ - -- Done. Any chance you can ITP cygbuild first, and make it part of the cygwin distro? It sounds useful, at any rate. I think a user should be able to recreate a binary tarball using what is available as part of the standard distro, rather than having to resort to grabbing something from CVS. - -- Life is short - so eat dessert first! Eric Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Cygwin) Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDIYSU84KuGfSFAYARAolsAJ90Op920hgguWg62QXaPOWiglj2WwCePbvL qxq59lx8/4FTAG4Ym+EnKys= =8Ne9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
