I just got this message today (after receiving almost every other
message between now and then). Yesterday Hack's messages and my own
messages were also delayed by several hours.
I'm sure I'm not the only one...
Harold
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 09:48:47AM -0700, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 2 20:58, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Got it...
One question though: when you built it, was it statically linking the
ssl libs? When I just rebuilt it, it statically linked them... which
makes me think that the openssl install dependency is wrong, since I'm
pretty sure there aren't any config files needed from the openssl
package and the dynamic libraries, by definition, aren't needed for
statically linked apps...
What do you think?
I know, you didn't ask me, but I'd prefer if applications are linked
against the OpenSSL shared libs for, hopefully, obvious reasons.
Right, I prefer that as well... I figured the preference was shared. No
pun intended :)
What I wanted to know, though, was historically whether wget has linked
against the static or shared libs so I would know if I was missing
something that caused the shared libs to work.
While we're debating shared vs. static can we get an announcement for
the version that's currently available?
cgf