On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 11:37:39PM -0700, Verse X wrote: > >Lapo Luchini wrote: > > > >> Does this means that it fails to load to you as it conflicts with other > >> DLLs? > > > >Yes, but only in certain cases and situations -- not in general. > > > >> Whose fault is it? My ld.exe? > > > >No, ld still defaults to --disable-auto-image-base. > > > >> Should I add a "rebase" in the building script? > > > >No, just "LDFLAGS=-Wl,--enable-auto-image-base ./configure ..." when > >configuring. > > > >Brian > > I'm new to this mailing list, and don't undertand what's going on here. > > Did Jan send Lapo some source patches, whereup Lapo built a lighttpd > package, > which he posted to http://www.lapo.it/cygwin/lighttpd-1.4.8-1.tar.bz2 (etc), > and which people subsequently have problem using because of "ImageBase > 10000000"? > > And then Brian suggested that Lapo rebuild with some additional linker > flags? > > This is how I sense the conversation went, although I couldn't figure out > who Christopher is and what he meant by "uploaded". > > My interest in this is simple: I would like to have the lastest lighttpd, > with fastcgi, > working under Cygwin. Using the tarball from www.lapo.it, I can install it > successfully, > but when I tried running it, I get this error ... > > 2006-01-11 23:33:19: > (/home/lapo/packaging/tmp/lighttpd-1.4.8/src/mod_fastcgi.c.1209) --- > fastcgi spawning > port: 0 > socket /tmp/lighttpd-socket > current: 0 / 10 > C:\cygwin\usr\sbin\lighttpd.exe (1072): *** unable to remap > C:\cygwin\lib\lighttpd\mod_indexfile.dll to same address as > parent(0x3F0000) != 0x970000 > 9 [main] lighttpd 2224 fork_parent: child 1072 died waiting for dll > loading > > If you guys can get this working, I think a LOT of people will be very > thankful. > I know I will :-)
I feel my efforts at watching imagebases in incoming upload requests have been vindicated now :)
