-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Igor Peshansky wrote: > Heh, that's cool, thanks for saving me the effort, Yaakov.
Well, IIRC, thank Gentoo for that solution. > Corinna already indicated her willingness to give over maintainership into > capable hands. I don't use Ruby regularly (just starting to dabble in > it), so I'm reluctant to make a grab for it. If you feel confident in > your ability to keep Cygwin Ruby going, would you like to offer to > maintain it? Not yet, although I'll try building it from source and see how it goes; there are a few very minor things I'd like to see changed. > Also, if there is a maintainership change, and since you've already > packaged RubyGems (and are presumably willing to maintain it as well), it > might (IMHO) be a good idea to fold RubyGems into the main Ruby package. I disagree with this one. The rubygems system isn't (yet) so integral to ruby like CPAN to perl. It's a separate package upstream with its own release cycle, so I think it should be a separate package here as well. Yaakov -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD0BL5piWmPGlmQSMRAmmYAJ916QhvxwkHMyaHt43/6X30Xp2y5ACgjrGr jSSlMPmWz01ugEH84cjpTMA= =/UDN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
