On Nov 27 18:38, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Now for something completely different: > > Did anything happen in the gcc 4.x world which would help us to get a > gcc 4.x for Cygwin at one point? Are some of the problems reported in > http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin-apps/2006-05/msg00044.html fixed in the > meantime? > > As for Charles' options how to go on: > > > (1) either you drop ada and java support, and we live with the > > ever-increasing brokenness that will accumulate in the sjlj code, or > > (2) you switch to dwarf2, we keep ada and java, but loose the callback > > stuff and break backward compatibility. > > (3) you release TWO entire SETS of compilers: an sjlj one with only > > C/C++/Fortran, and a "real" one with DWARF2 and the full compiler > > suite. This is a support nightmare; I recommend against. > > I'd opt for option 2.
Dave? Any opinion from the gcc maintainer? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
