On May 22 06:38, Eric Blake wrote: > Without futimens/utimensat, there is no way to set nanosecond resolution > (where that granularity is supported). As far as I can tell, the only > reason that coreutils still uses the non-standardized futimesat with a > NULL pathname is that it provided more resolution than any standardized > function, while supporting glibc that had not yet implemented the > standardized futimens/utimensat. I guess all that is needed now is a > patch to coreutils and/or gnulib to prefer the standardized names (and > fall back to futimesat under the hood when needed), rather than preferring > the non-standardized name.
ACK. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
