On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 06:19:36PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: >According to Christopher Faylor on 12/30/2008 2:00 PM: >>Would anyone mind if I changed the format of setup.hint to some >>existing markup language? > >No problem by me, as long as the conversion process is easy to follow.
I'll do the conversion to whatever it is so you'd just have to understand the new format. I'm currently deciding between yaml, curly ml, and just forgetting about it. I'm also wondering if we should just be using rpm and forgetting about our own package format. Of course rpm comes with its own set of problems. cgf
