On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> I know that Dave asked for this but I really don't see the need to add >>> this much machinery. ?I think this is a lot of work to go to for >>> something that is run infrequently and which is usually just clicked >>> through. ?For other installers, people just seem to live with whatever >>> they do rather than kvetching the geometry of the windows. >> >>I don't think that this patch interferes with anyone running things >>from the command line, > > The issue is adding code complexity. setup.exe is already a nightmare > so adding another two classes and control flow for what I would consider > to be a little-used feature doesn't make sense to me.
Understood. I'll let it go. Jonathon Merz
