On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 01:58:11PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 01:45:32PM -0400, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >>>Yes, but it's a lower priority to me than getting the base system solid >>>first. Also, it needs re-arranging w32api and the mingw libs into a >>>real cross-$prefix/$target, rather than putting them in subdirs of >>>$prefix/lib and $prefix/include as we currently do. >> >>I'm more than happy to make any packaging adjustments to the w32api and >>mingw-runtime packages, just let me know what I need to do. >> >>>PTC for the gcc-4 cygport file if you want to help! (I was planning to >>>make the same one serve for both builds by defining a bash shell >>>variable to tell it whether to build cygwin or mingw compilers.) >> >>I'll take a look at it. > >Chris, how would you and the other MinGW developers feel about moving >mingw and w32api somewhere else?
Just to be clear: By "somewhere else" I meant into their own repositories, not away from sourceware. cgf
