´Dave, > Ah, I found the thread: "[RFC] 1.7 Packaging: Documentation", beginning > 15/08/2008 08:43 on -apps. Righto, so the unversioned ones are the correct > ones to keep.
> For such packages, there's always the _CYGPORT_RESTRICT_postinst_doc_ flag > as a workaround, but it's better to fix the makefiles, either upstream or in a > cygwin-specific .src.patch. So we will go without the version number. How would you prefer for me to change the package for 1.7. I can do a cygwin specific src patch if wanted. It seems as the better and cleaner solution. I will then provide a patch to upstream so that task 1.8 will be "correct" in terms of Makfile. I will do it throughout the week (some travelling coming up) Can you do another review next weekend? ;-) hinthint ;-) I assume I can post the RFU for cygwin 1.5 though. /Fredde
