On Jul 1 23:56, Dean Scarff wrote: > Dave Korn wrote: > [...] > >>> - should setup.hint have requires: cygwin? nasm's does. > > > > No, that's now an obsolete practice, it should be removed. See e.g.: > > > > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2009-06/msg00145.html > > In that case: > > http://scarff.id.au/file/cygwin/nasm/setup.hint > > >>> - should it be /usr/share/doc/nasm or /usr/share/doc/nasm-2.06? nasm's > >>> is the former > >> > >> Every package seems to have its own idea how to name the doc dir. It's > >> not *that* important. I guess the better approach is to omit the > >> version. After all, you usually have just one of the packages installed > >> and the user doesn't exactly care for the actual version of the package > >> when looking for the docs. > > > > Omitting the version number is the new convention; see the thread: "[RFC] > > 1.7 Packaging: Documentation": > > > > http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2008-08/threads.html#00081 > > Thanks for the references, guess I didn't search hard enough. ;) > > Not sure whether there's a "setup2.html" in reserve, but when the time > comes, I've attached a patch for setup.html for these two issues.
I checked that in. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat