On 7/1/2009 12:24 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 1 09:49, David Rothenberger wrote:
On 7/1/2009 3:52 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jun 30 09:02, David Rothenberger wrote:
On 6/30/2009 1:30 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Here, the aprutil1 package still exists in the 1.7 release area, but
I don't think it makes sense anymore, along the same lines as for
libapr1. I think it should be ok to remove it from the 1.7 release.
What do you say?
The aprutil1 and apr1 packages are just transition packages to help
people upgrade from the old package naming schema to the new one.
They don't need to be in the 1.7 area if we believe everyone will
have updated their apr1 and aprutil1 packages before they try to
upgrade to 1.7. I'm not sure that's true, though. It seems there are
at least some people that only update once every 3-5 years. :-)
So you'd rather have the apr1 package in the 1.7 release as well?
I don't know the right answer.
What I was trying to say is this: It's your choice.
Okay, then yes, I'd like to have the apr1 and aprutil1 packages in the
1.7 release area.
Thanks.
--
David Rothenberger ---- [email protected]
economist, n:
Someone who's good with figures, but doesn't have enough
personality to become an accountant.
