Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: >> and the /usr/share/doc/librsvg2/* should go into a new package >> "librsvg2-doc" along with all of the html/* files from librsvg2-devel. > > The docs in $pkgdocdir are the standard COPYING/NEWS/README docs that > all users should receive,
Well, IMO it should be their option whether they want to dl/install the licensing and docu along with the actual DLL (which may be /required/ in order to use some application). By packaging them in a single tarball, the user doesn't get that option; it's all or nothing. But this isn't policy; it's just my opinion. > but the html docs in librsvg2-devel are > gtk-doc API documentation that would only be of interest to developers > and packagers. Ack. >> Otherwise, rebuilds fine from source and passes its builtin testsuite. As does the -2 version. GTG. -- Chuck