On 3/14/2010 8:17 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Mar 13 14:41, Charles Wilson wrote: >> Is that an approval for the whole patch, or simply a comment on the >> msg() vs. note() vs. [] issue? > > It was just a comment on the msg/note issue,
OK. > but the Makefile issues > seem to be unavoidable anyway (assuming you don't want to tweak the > header files) Nope. > and the replacement code looks good. Above all, I'm > fairly certain you tested your code, Yep. > so I don't have any problem if you > check this in. Done. Thanks... -- Chuck
