On 08/14/2010 01:13 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 08:05:00PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >> So I really don't think it's worth the end-user's while in this >> instance, but I'd like to hear what Corinna and cgf think before I >> proceed. > > I'm with you on this, Dave. Your reasonsing seems right to me. I don't > normally like to make silent changes to existing packages but in this > case it seems like the least intrusive way to fix the problem. > > I wouldn't even announce the change since that would probably generate > some confusion.
My only worry now is if any mirrors will have a stale checksum that doesn't correspond to the new tarball. But I'm convinced that it's worth trying the silent upgrade, now. -- Eric Blake [email protected] +1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
