On 9/30/2010 2:27 AM, Gernot Hillier wrote: > As the inetutils' tftpd is too limited for our use cases
I'll take a look at your packaging, and give the client/server a few tests -- but it will have to wait until the weekend. The first thing I noted, is that tftp-hpa still installs the server as "/usr/sbin/in.tftpd" (no .exe). For consistency with the inetutils server it is replacing -- and cygwin standards -- that should be renamed to "/usr/sbin/tftpd.exe" I'd always intended to retire inetutil's tftpd and tftp in favor of the hpa version, but I haven't had enough 'tuits. Thanks! We'll need to coordinate the release of tftp-hpa with an update to inetutils (removing its tftp*). If possible, it would be nice to split the server and client components into two separate packages (see rsh and rsh-server). I'd also like to "move" the relevant documentation from /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/inetutils.README to /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/tftp-hpa.README (and /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/tftp-hpa-server.README?) +1. (not that you need votes, since tftp-hpa is already in the distros) -- Chuck cygwin inetutils maintainer
