--- Sab 13/11/10, Andy Koppe ha scritto: > On 12 November 2010 13:09, Marco > Atzeri wrote: > > The Mutt E-Mail Client > > > > "All mail clients suck. This one just sucks less." > > -the author, circa 1995 > > > > The package is present in all distributions. > > This package depends on "libslang2" still in ITP > > I'm wondering, does it make a difference to users whether > it's built > for slang or ncurses? > > Andy
Hi Andy, as mutt is already available and this ITP is clearly wrong, your question is purely academic. ;-) I built with s-lang as I was building slrn that need slang, and I wrongly thought we were missing mutt for the same reason. I am not sure about the answer to your question; on debian they built against ncursesw while on archlinux they build with s-lang for this reason: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/10689 My version of s-lang is built with Onigurama so it should work also with Japanese like languages, but I am afraid is just mine guess and I could be completely wrong. Marco
