On Dec 10 17:42, Peter Rosin wrote: > Den 2010-12-10 17:08 skrev Corinna Vinschen: > > On Dec 10 16:47, Peter Rosin wrote: > >> Den 2010-12-10 16:11 skrev Corinna Vinschen: > >>> Obviously it would be nice if libtool had an option to do it right in > >>> `make install'. For instance, some '-install-as-module' option which > >>> results in copying only the DLLs to $(libexecdir)/syslog-ng, but which > >>> omits the .dll.a and .la files since they are note required anyway. > >>> Something like that doesn't exist, I assume. WOuld it be an option > >>> > >>> to implement this? > >> > >> IIRC, libtool should not do the ../bin dance when it installs libtool > >> modules, so I can only assume that these syslog-ng modules are not built > >> as libtool modules, but instead as ordinary libtool libraries. Does > >> syslog-ng supply the -module option to libtool? > > > > No, it doesn't. I just tested it and -module does basically the right > > thing, except that it still copies the .dll.a and .la files to the > > target directory. > > Yes, those are not needed in simple cases like this. > > > Anyway, thanks for the hint! > > Glad to be of help! > > > How do I add this to Makefile.am? Does AM_LDFLAGS make sense for this? > > Taking modules/syslogformat/Makefile.am as an example, I would > add -module to the libsyslogformat_la_LDFLAGS variable. Then the > same for all other modules of course. Then send upstream and forget > about it, I don't see any reason for not adding -module for modules.
Ok, that makes sense. Thanks again. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
